U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

SRX8706923: GSM4665701: E12_WL_invCS3840_ChIP_CTCF; Mus musculus; ChIP-Seq
1 ILLUMINA (Illumina HiSeq 4000) run: 21.8M spots, 1.1G bases, 335.1Mb downloads

Submitted by: NCBI (GEO)
Study: Chromatin topology and the timing of enhancer function at the HoxD locus [ChIP-seq]
show Abstracthide Abstract
The HoxD gene cluster is critical for proper limb formation in tetrapods. In the emerging limb buds, different sub-groups of Hoxd genes respond first to a proximal regulatory signal, then to a distal signal that organizes digits. These two regulations are exclusive from one another and emanate separately from two TADs flanking HoxD, both containing a range of appropriate enhancer sequences. The telomeric TAD (T-DOM) contains several enhancers active in presumptive forearm cells and is divided into two sub-TADs separated by a CTCF-rich boundary, which defines two regulatory sub-modules. To understand the importance of this particular regulatory topology to control Hoxd gene transcription in time and space, we either deleted or inverted this sub-TAD boundary, eliminated the CTCF binding sites or inverted the entire T-DOM to exchange the respective positions of the two sub-TADs. The effects of such perturbations on the transcriptional regulation of Hoxd genes illustrates the requirement of this regulatory topology for the precise timing of gene activation. However, the spatial distribution of transcripts is eventually resumed, showing that the presence of enhancers sequences, rather than either their exact topology or a particular chromatin architecture, is the key factor. We also show that the affinity of enhancers to find their natural target genes can overcome the presence of both a strong TAD border and an unfavourable orientation of CTCF sites. Overall design: ChIPmentation analysis of H3K27ac, CTCF, RAD21 in embryonic limb tissues of wild-type and mutant mice.
Sample: E12_WL_invCS3840_ChIP_CTCF
SAMN15502759 • SRS6983611 • All experiments • All runs
Organism: Mus musculus
Library:
Instrument: Illumina HiSeq 4000
Strategy: ChIP-Seq
Source: GENOMIC
Selection: ChIP
Layout: SINGLE
Construction protocol: For E9.5 ChIP samples, 15 to 17 pairs of forelimb buds were used for each experiment. For the E12.5 H3K27ac ChIP sample, proximal forelimbs were dissected from wild-type mice. For E12.5 CTCF ChIP samples, the four whole limbs were micro-dissected from one mouse embryo either from wild type or mutant lines (del CTCF(CS38), delCTCF(CS38;CS40), inv(CS38-40)). All samples were taken from homozygous crosses.Tissues were dissected, fixed in 1% formaldehyde (in PBS) for 10 min at room temperature and the reaction was quenched with Stop Solution from the ChIP-IT High sensitive kit (Active Motif). Samples were then washed 3 times with working Washing Solution (ChIP-IT, Active Motif) and then snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80ºC until further processing. Limb tissues were disrupted with a polytron device, lysed in RIPA buffer or Prep Buffer (ChIP-IT, Active Motif) and sonicated in Diagenode Bioruptor Pico. All experiments were processed following the ChIPmentation protocol (Sc hmidl et al., 2015) as in (Rodríguez-Carballo et al., 2019). Around 0.6 million cells were used for each IP on a final volume of 800 to 1000ul of RIPA-LS buffer (10mM Tris-HCl pH8, 140mM NaCl, 1mM EDTA pH8, 0.1% SDS, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton x-100 and proteinase inhibitors). They were incubated overnight with the respective antibodies (CTCF Active Motif 61311; H3K27ac Diagenode C15410196; RAD21 abcam ab992) and precipitated after a 2h long incubation with magnetic beads (Dynabeads Protein A, Invitrogen 10001D) rotating at 4ºC. Washes were performed as follows: two times RIPA-LS, two times RIPA-HS (10mM Tris-HCl pH8, 500mM NaCl, 1mM EDTA pH8, 0.1% SDS, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton x-100 and proteinase inhibitors), two times RIPA-LiCl (10mM Tris-HCl pH8, 250mM LiCl, 1mM EDTA pH8, 0.5% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate and proteinase inhibitors) and once with 10mM Tris-HCl pH8. Beads were resuspended in 24ul of tagmentation buffer (10mM Tris pH8, 5mM MgCl2, 10% dimeth ylformamide). They were incubated at 37ºC for either 2 minutes (CTCF, RAD21), or 10 minutes (H3K27ac) with 1 µl of Tn5 transposase (Illumina 15027865, from Nextera DNA Library Prep Kit 15028212). Samples were then resuspended and washed twice in 1ml of RIPA-LS and twice in 1ml TE buffer (10mM Tris-Hcl pH8, 1mM EDTA pH8). Beads were magnetised, DNA was eluted in ChIP elution buffer (10mM Tris-HCl pH8, 5mM EDTA pH8, 300mM NaCl, 0.4% SDS) with 2ul of proteinase K (20mg/ml stock) and then incubated for 1 hour at 55ºC and 6 hours to overnight at 65ºC. After de-crosslinking, the supernatant was recovered and beads were resuspended again in 19ul ChIP elution buffer with 1ul of proteinase K and left 1 hour at 55ºC. The two supernatants were combined and purified with MinElute kit (Qiagen) in 22ul of EB buffer. Relative quantitation was performed using SYBR-green as in (Schmidl et al, 2015; PMID:26280331) using 2ul of DNA. Libraries were amplified according to the Cq values obtained in the previous step, purified and size selected with CleanNGS magnetic beads (CleanNA) and eluted in 15ul of water. DNA was sequenced in a HiSeq 4000 machine as 50 bp or 100 bp reads. Libraries of ChIP experiments were generated following the ChIPmentation protocol (Schmidl et al, 2015; PMID:26280331).
Experiment attributes:
GEO Accession: GSM4665701
Links:
Runs: 1 run, 21.8M spots, 1.1G bases, 335.1Mb
Run# of Spots# of BasesSizePublished
SRR1219356121,770,7431.1G335.1Mb2020-11-10

ID:
11329146

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...